Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Craig Aaron results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 72.5% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 476.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,581 of 28,364 speakers). This Craig Aaron is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Craig Aaron
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 120
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.1% percentile
33.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos120 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 72.5%72.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 52.8%52.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 36.3%36.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 33.1%33.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 33.1%33.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 27.5%27.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 36.3%36.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.9%16.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Ad Hominem: Speaker 72.5%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 52.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 33.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 33.1%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos