Speaker summary
⁠68%4 analyzed articles/videos132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Council on American-Islamic Relations results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Ad Hominem, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 77.1% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 226.47 faulty-reasoning hits from 132 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 26.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,170 of 28,364 speakers). This Council on American-Islamic Relations is better (less manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Council on American-Islamic Relations

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510043.0% percentile
26.6% BS Score4 analyzed videos132 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 77.1%77.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 34.3%34.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 77.1%, sitewide 26.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos