Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,381 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Linda Sarsour results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 42.4% saturation with 2,340 hits . Analysis detected 12,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (987 of 6,359 authors). This Linda Sarsour is worse (more manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group. Linda Sarsour
Author details
Total words: 5,524
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.5% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 42.4% 42.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 19.1% 19.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 18.8% 18.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.6% 15.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.7% 11.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.5% 7.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 42.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Author 19.1%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 18.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 9.3%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst