Speaker summary
⁠48%3 analyzed articles/videos143 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Product Safety Commission results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Loss Aversion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 130 faulty-reasoning hits from 143 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 23.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (17,777 of 28,364 speakers). This Consumer Product Safety Commission is better (less manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group.
Consumer Product Safety Commission
Speaker details
Total words: 143
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510037.3% percentile
23.1% BS Score3 analyzed videos143 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.9%30.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 19.7%19.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos