Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video90.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Colossal Biosciences results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 71.4% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 336.017 faulty-reasoning hits from 90.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (12,765 of 26,960 speakers). This Colossal Biosciences is worse (more manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Colossal Biosciences
Speaker details
Total words: 90.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510052.7% percentile
34.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos90.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 71.4%71.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 42.2%42.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 40.2%40.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 42.2%42.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 14.3%14.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 71.4%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 42.2%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 42.2%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 40.2%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos