Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Colin O'Brien results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Begging the Question as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 156 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 67.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,062 of 28,364 speakers). This Colin O'Brien is worse (more manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group.
Colin O'Brien
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510078.6% percentile
67.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 69.0%69.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 69.0%69.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 31.0%31.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 69.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 69.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 26.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos