Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video92.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Power results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 79.7% saturation with 102 hits. Analysis detected 367.222 faulty-reasoning hits from 92.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (11,921 of 28,364 speakers). This Climate Power is worse (more manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Climate Power
Speaker details
Total words: 92.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.0% percentile
39.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos92.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 79.7%79.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 54.4%54.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 45.1%45.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 43.1%43.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 60.2%60.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 10.9%10.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 79.7%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 60.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 54.4%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 45.1%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 43.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos