Speaker summary
⁠98%2 analyzed articles/videos187.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clean Up City Hall results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, False Dilemma, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 60.2% saturation with 112.895 hits. Analysis detected 569.895 faulty-reasoning hits from 187.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 29.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (14,933 of 28,187 speakers). This Clean Up City Hall is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Clean Up City Hall
Speaker details
Total words: 187.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510047.0% percentile
29.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos187.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 44.1%44.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 60.2%60.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 45.2%45.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 22.6%22.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 22.6%22.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 22.6%22.6%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 22.6%22.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 60.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 45.2%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 44.1%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 1.7%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 0.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos