Speaker summary
ā 38%1 analyzed article/video49.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Claudia Sahm results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ā 70% (8,596 of 28,364 speakers). This Claudia Sahm is worse (more manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
Claudia Sahm
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 70%Claudia Sahm (selected)50%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 49.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510069.7% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos49.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos