Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video63.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Claude Weyant results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Personal Incredulity, Status Quo Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Out-Group Homogeneity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 114 faulty-reasoning hits from 63.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (21,234 of 28,364 speakers). This Claude Weyant is better (less manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Claude Weyant
Speaker details
Total words: 63.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510025.1% percentile
16.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos63.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.4%16.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 3.1%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos