Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clare Reichenbach results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias and Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 65.9% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 204 faulty-reasoning hits from 102 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 55.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,292 of 26,780 speakers). This Clare Reichenbach is worse (more manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Clare Reichenbach
Speaker details
Total words: 102
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.8% percentile
55.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos102 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 65.8%65.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 65.8%65.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 34.1%34.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 65.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 65.8%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos