Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video174.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Citizens Financial Group results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 93% saturation with 162.371 hits. Analysis detected 408.371 faulty-reasoning hits from 174.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,830 of 28,364 speakers). This Citizens Financial Group is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Citizens Financial Group
Speaker details
Total words: 174.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510044.2% percentile
27.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos174.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 93.0%93.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.9%15.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 20.6%20.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 93.0%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos