Speaker summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cindy McVey results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 220.355 faulty-reasoning hits from 165 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (26,136 of 28,364 speakers). This Cindy McVey is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group.
Cindy McVey
Speaker details
Total words: 165
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751007.9% percentile
8.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos165 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.2%5.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.2%5.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos