Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 649 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Sinco Keleher results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Anecdotal , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 106 hits . Analysis detected 711 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,338 of 6,361 authors). This Jennifer Sinco Keleher is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Jennifer Sinco Keleher
Author details
Total words: 2,596
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst