Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video126 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chuck Robbins results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anecdotal, and Self-Serving Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 44.6% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 282.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 126 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,655 of 28,364 speakers). This Chuck Robbins is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Chuck Robbins
Speaker details
Total words: 126
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
27.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos126 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 55.4%55.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 44.6%44.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.3%31.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 23.8%23.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 10.7%10.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 55.4%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 44.6%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos