Author summary
47% 1 analyzed article/video 797 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lacey Latch results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 581 hits . Analysis detected 1,582 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,391 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,042 of 6,363 authors). This Lacey Latch is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group. Lacey Latch
Author details
Total words: 2,391
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.9% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 24.3% 24.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 24.3%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst