Speaker summary
⁠65%2 analyzed articles/videos188.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Weinbel results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Straw Man, Self-Serving Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 58.7% saturation with 115.309 hits. Analysis detected 310.84 faulty-reasoning hits from 188.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 31.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,404 of 28,364 speakers). This Christopher Weinbel is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Christopher Weinbel
Speaker details
Total words: 188.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.2% percentile
31.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos188.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 58.7%58.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.6%21.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 58.7%, sitewide 15.9%Straw Man: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos