Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Hahn results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, In-Group Bias, and Anecdotal, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 30.375 hits. Analysis detected 192.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 67.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,022 of 28,364 speakers). This Christopher Hahn is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
Christopher Hahn
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510078.8% percentile
67.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos