Speaker summary
⁠65%2 analyzed articles/videos317.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Cabaldon results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, False Dilemma, and Straw Man, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 128 hits. Analysis detected 744.435 faulty-reasoning hits from 317.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (25,202 of 27,534 speakers). This Christopher Cabaldon is better (less manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group.
Christopher Cabaldon
Speaker details
Total words: 317.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751008.5% percentile
8.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos317.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 19.4%19.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos