Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video53.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Anderson results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Actor-Observer Bias, and Bandwagon, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 119.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 53.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,006 of 26,837 speakers). This Christopher Anderson is worse (more manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Christopher Anderson
Speaker details
Total words: 53.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510059.0% percentile
41.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos53.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 66.3%66.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 33.8%33.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 16.3%16.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 66.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 33.8%, sitewide 0.6%Bandwagon: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 2.2%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos