Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video39 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 74 faulty-reasoning hits from 39 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 47.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,481 of 28,364 speakers). This Christopher is worse (more manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Christopher
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 39
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510063.1% percentile
47.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos39 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 42.3%42.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 42.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos