Speaker summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video208.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christine Junker results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 91 faulty-reasoning hits from 208.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,231 of 28,364 speakers). This Christine Junker is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Christine Junker
Speaker details
Total words: 208.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510021.6% percentile
14.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos208.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 22.3%22.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 10.4%10.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos