Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video96.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christine Harbin results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Burden of Proof, and False Dilemma, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 84.5% saturation with 94.633 hits. Analysis detected 321.633 faulty-reasoning hits from 96.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (14,010 of 37,791 speakers). This Christine Harbin is worse (more manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Christine Harbin
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠63%Christine Harbin (selected)45%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 96.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510062.9% percentile
44.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos96.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 84.5%84.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 65.2%65.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 31.0%31.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 31.0%31.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 27.2%27.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 84.5%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 65.2%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos