Speaker summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video53.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christine Goodall results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 30% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 88 faulty-reasoning hits from 53.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,798 of 28,364 speakers). This Christine Goodall is better (less manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
Christine Goodall
Speaker details
Total words: 53.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510044.3% percentile
27.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos53.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.0%20.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos