Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,503 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eve Livingston results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 615 hits . Analysis detected 4,496 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,012 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 8% (5,721 of 6,204 authors). This Eve Livingston is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group. Eve Livingston
Author details
Total words: 10,012
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst