Speaker summary
33% 1 analyzed article/video 1,883 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris White results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Optimism Bias , with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 136 hits . Analysis detected 1,133.301 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,883 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,331 of 28,364 speakers). This Chris White is better (less manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group. Chris White
Speaker details
Total words: 1,883
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst