Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Van Holland results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Tu Quoque, and Begging the Question, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 85.3% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 194 faulty-reasoning hits from 68 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 57.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,431 of 28,364 speakers). This Chris Van Holland is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Chris Van Holland
Speaker details
Total words: 68
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.8% percentile
57.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos68 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 85.3%85.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 85.3%85.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 85.3%85.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 14.7%14.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 85.3%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 85.3%, sitewide 26.9%Tu Quoque: Speaker 85.3%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos