Fox News98%

Democrats are NOT wavering on this, Jonathan Fahey warns 94%

3/30/2026, 5:15:06 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 27% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,695 faulty-reasoning hits from 778 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 88.8% and a BS Rank of 94% (1,502 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 93.10% of the video peer group.

Travelers across the country still wrapped up in long lines at the airport as the DHS shutdown drags on, but barter borders Tom Hman says ICE is here to help as we learn more than 500 TSA agents have quit since the start of this shutdown. 
>> We're going to continue an ICE presence there and until the airports feel like they're in they're in 100%, you know, in a posture where they they can do normal operations. 
If if if less TS agents come back, that means we'll keep more ICE agents there. 
The president been clear. 
He wants to secure those airports, 
especially as I said earlier increased 
threat posture. We need to secure those 
airports. ISIS is there to help our 
brothers and sisters in TSA. We'll be 
there as long as they need us until they get back to normal operations and feel like those airports are secure. 
>> Former DHS Deputy Assistant Secretary Jonathan Feain, he joins me now. 
Jonathan, so checks are expected to arrive soon because of the president's executive order, but as we just said, 500 agents have already quit. 
So, has the damage already been done here? 
>> Well, I think there's been a lot of damage already done. 
And and you're right, 500 people have quit because things were placed so bad they couldn't afford to do it, even if they wanted to. 
So, yeah, they'll have to be rehired or get new agents in there. 
But yeah, there's been a lot of damage done and I think what President Trump did is paying them, which is a great thing. 
I think they're getting paid today and having the ICE agents there and more law enforcement there is certainly important with the longer lines which makes people more vulnerable and also the increased security threat. 
So all of those things I think that's moving in a good direction. 
direction. But the Democrats seem like I think they really gave up the game with what they voted on Friday because they had always talked about, hey, this was about reforms. 
We want to reform ICE and yet they were giddy to vote for something that had zero reforms and just simply didn't fund ICE. 
So I think everyone knows how this breaks down. 
It's mass deport, mass amnesty for the illegal aliens or deport illegal alien criminals is where this breaks down. 
the Democrats are not wavering on this. 
>> Yeah, talking about votes. 
We're talking about Congress here. 
So, let's bring in Maryland Senator Chris Van Holland with his latest thoughts over the weekend on the DH DHS shutdown. 
I guess what's confusing here is you have fought and blocked the funding for the Department of Homeland Security because you object as you just outlined to what ICE has been doing and you wanted to force changes and yet the only thing that has been assured throughout all of this is that ICE already has the money. 
We are not prepared to give ICE another10 billion dollars. 
>> Yeah. 
>> On top of the monies they already have and are using in many of these lawless operations. 
>> But Democrats have already received a lot. So what more could they be wanting out of this? 
>> Yeah. Yeah. He really pointed the irony to this whole thing out because to get whatever they supposedly want, they're willing to defund FEMA, defund all the SISA, which is cyber security. 
So they really want, if you break it down, they want essentially mass amnesty. 
And everything they want to do is to either stop deportations or to make it harder for President Trump to deport people. 
But I think uh Van Holland was really called out during that interview because when they're offered reforms, they say no. 
And when they're and when they have the option to just shut down ICE, they say yes. 
So they clearly don't want reforms. 
They want ICE to stop doing its job. 
And again, as we all know, ISIS job is not lawful. 
It's not only lawful, but it's required to enforce the immigration law. 
>> Yeah. Well, checks are hopefully going to be arriving very soon, some people say today. 
So, hopefully things go back to normal at a rapid pace. 
to normal at a rapid pace. Former DHS Deputy Assistant Secretary Jonathan Fehee, we thank you for your time. 
>> Thank you. I'm Steve Ducey. I'm Brian 
Kilme. 
>> And I'm Anley Airheart. And click here 
to subscribe to the Fox News YouTube 
page to catch our hottest interviews and 
most compelling analysis. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 27.0%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias27.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic9.8%This article: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic1.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias6.9%This article: 20.7%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect20.7%This article: 8.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion8.7%This article: 8.5%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias8.5%This article: 2.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect2.1%This article: 5.1%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.0%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias14.0%This article: 3.1%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias3.1%This article: 5.3%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error5.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.9%This article: 4.0%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.0%This article: 3.1%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 12.3%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man12.3%This article: 12.0%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority12.0%This article: 6.7%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma6.7%This article: 6.3%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope6.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 21.5%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization21.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.2%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon1.2%This article: 4.6%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion4.6%This article: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question1.3%This article: 6.3%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.3%This article: 7.5%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque7.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.5%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.3%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice1.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 10.8%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias10.8%This article: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.9%

778 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers69%attributed speech239writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageTom Hman • 32 words • 0.0% coverageTom Hman • 16 words • 0.0% coverageTom Hman • 4 words • 0.0% coverageTom Hman • 6 words • 0.0% coverageTom Hman • 6 words • 0.0% coverageTom Hman • 7 words • 0.0% coverageTom Hman • 7 words • 0.0% coverageTom Hman • 7 words • 0.0% coverageTom Hman • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 25 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 24 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 35 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 31 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 24 words • 100.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageChris Van Holland • 58 words • 0.0% coverageChris Van Holland • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 33 words • 100.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Feain • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Kilme • 1 words • 0.0% coverageAnley Airheart • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Chris Van Holland

100%flagged-word coverage
68 attributed words13% of attributed speech67% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Politically Right Leaning -11.3 ptsWriter: 11.3%Chris Van Holland: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%Chris Van Holland: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.9 ptsWriter: 2.9%Chris Van Holland: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.