Speaker summary
⁠41%2 analyzed articles/videos120.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Saracino results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 43.24 hits. Analysis detected 105.24 faulty-reasoning hits from 120.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,327 of 28,364 speakers). This Chris Saracino is better (less manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
Chris Saracino
Speaker details
Total words: 120.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510021.3% percentile
14.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos120.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 10.2%10.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos