Speaker summary
⁠58%2 analyzed articles/videos245.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Oberholster results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Emotion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 476.079 faulty-reasoning hits from 245.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,481 of 28,364 speakers). This Chris Oberholster is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Chris Oberholster
Speaker details
Total words: 245.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510031.3% percentile
19.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos245.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.4%28.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 26.6%26.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 0.5%Special Pleading: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos