Speaker summary
⁠66%2 analyzed articles/videos105 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Best results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.1% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 350.482 faulty-reasoning hits from 105 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 25.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,542 of 28,364 speakers). This Chris Best is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Chris Best
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 105
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510041.7% percentile
25.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos105 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 36.4%36.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 46.1%46.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 39.1%39.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 33.7%33.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 46.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 39.1%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 36.4%, sitewide 2.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 33.7%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos