Author summary
44% 1 analyzed article/video 777 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Ventresca results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 273 hits . Analysis detected 2,491 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,935 of 6,382 authors). This Rachel Ventresca is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group. Rachel Ventresca
Author details
Total words: 3,108
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst