Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video231 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chinese National Space Administration (CNSA) results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Hindsight Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 57.1% saturation with 132 hits. Analysis detected 247 faulty-reasoning hits from 231 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (16,114 of 28,364 speakers). This Chinese National Space Administration (CNSA) is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Chinese National Space Administration (CNSA)
Speaker details
Total words: 231
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510043.2% percentile
26.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos231 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 57.1%57.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.8%26.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 57.1%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos