Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chase Thomason results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, In-Group Bias, and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 76% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 252 faulty-reasoning hits from 100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,424 of 28,364 speakers). This Chase Thomason is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
Chase Thomason
Speaker details
Total words: 100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.7% percentile
42.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos100 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 76.0%76.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 76.0%76.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 38.0%38.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 38.0%38.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 12.0%12.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 76.0%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 76.0%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 38.0%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 38.0%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos