Speaker summary
⁠82%2 analyzed articles/videos37 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chase Infiniti results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 83.8% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 62 faulty-reasoning hits from 37 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 83.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,800 of 26,780 speakers). This Chase Infiniti is worse (more manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group.
Chase Infiniti
Speaker details
Total words: 37
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510082.1% percentile
83.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos37 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 83.8%83.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 83.8%83.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 83.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 83.8%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos