Speaker summary
⁠82%2 analyzed articles/videos41 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chase results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 46.3% saturation with 19 hits. Analysis detected 51 faulty-reasoning hits from 41 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 41.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,452 of 28,069 speakers). This Chase is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Chase
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 41
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510059.2% percentile
41.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos41 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 46.3%46.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 39.0%39.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 39.0%39.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 46.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 39.0%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 39.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos