Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video70.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlie Fusco results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 55 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (21,041 of 28,364 speakers). This Charlie Fusco is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
Charlie Fusco
Speaker details
Total words: 70.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510025.8% percentile
16.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos70.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 11.8%11.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos