Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video180 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Poole results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 41.625 hits. Analysis detected 216.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (25,232 of 28,364 speakers). This Charles Poole is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Charles Poole
Speaker details
Total words: 180
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510011.0% percentile
9.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos180 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos