STLPR0%

Legionella bacteria closes St. Louis Public Schools headquarters 8%

By Sarah Fentem57%

6/5/2026, 9:22:31 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 383 faulty-reasoning hits from 348 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 24% and a BS Rank of 8% (20,310 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 92.80% of the article peer group.

St. 
Louis Public Schools staff members are working from other locations after environmental testing found legionella bacteria in the water and cooling systems at the district’s downtown headquarters. 
Legionella can cause a type of pneumonia called Legionnaires’ disease. 
People can become infected by ingesting contaminated water or breathing in contaminated air droplets. 
The disease is not usually spread from person to person. 
It’s unclear how long the building on North 11th Street will remain closed, district Communications Director Charles Poole said. 
More testing will determine the extent of the contamination. 
“We’re anticipating we’ll have results of the testing by mid- to late next week, and by that time we’ll be able to determine what our go-forward posture will be,” he said. 
Poole said Friday he is not overly concerned about the health risk to people who work in the building. 
District officials learned about the bacteria Thursday evening when they received the test results. 
On Friday morning, workers wore masks as they picked up work materials from the downtown headquarters. 
Workers tested the building’s water systems after a pipe burst there and caused significant damage earlier this spring, Poole said. 
“It wasn’t something that was sitting and lingering, it was part of the mitigation,” he said. 
“You want to test for obvious things like mold and whatnot, as it turned out during this particular test, during the mitigation process we happened to find this particular issue.” 
Next week’s school board meeting is now scheduled to be held at Carr Lane Middle School on North Jefferson Avenue. 
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, legionella bacteria occur naturally in lakes and rivers. 
The bacteria can become dangerous when it invades water systems, where it proliferates in warm, slow-moving water. 
Legionnaires’ disease emerged in the mid-20th century. 
The infection gets its unique name from some of its first identified patients: dozens of people who became sick after returning from an American Legion convention in Philadelphia in 1976. 
Eventually, federal health investigators found the bacteria inside the convention hotel’s cooling system. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.6%Sarah Fentem: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.6%Sarah Fentem: 3.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic8.6%This article: 4.9%Sarah Fentem: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic4.9%This article: 2.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias2.0%This article: 5.5%Sarah Fentem: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias5.5%This article: 9.8%Sarah Fentem: 6.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect9.8%This article: 2.9%Sarah Fentem: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion2.9%This article: 5.7%Sarah Fentem: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.9%Sarah Fentem: 4.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias8.9%This article: 4.6%Sarah Fentem: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias4.6%This article: 5.5%Sarah Fentem: 6.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias5.5%This article: 5.5%Sarah Fentem: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Sarah Fentem: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect4.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.3%Sarah Fentem: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.3%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.9%Sarah Fentem: 4.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority4.9%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.6%Sarah Fentem: 3.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization8.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 6.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.6%Sarah Fentem: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 6.6%Sarah Fentem: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature6.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 3.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.6%Sarah Fentem: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.5%Sarah Fentem: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote5.5%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 3.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

348 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers44%attributed speech196writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageCharles Poole • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageCharles Poole • 31 words • 0.0% coverageCharles Poole • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageCharles Poole • 20 words • 0.0% coverageCharles Poole • 16 words • 0.0% coverageCharles Poole • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Charles Poole

85%flagged-word coverage
135 attributed words89% of attributed speech70% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote+14.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Charles Poole: 14.1%14.1%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.