Keyword summary
⁠29%3 analyzed articles/videos1,276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legionella Bacteria results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 357 hits. Analysis detected 3,503 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,964 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (30,885 of 35,675 keywords). This Legionella Bacteria is better (less manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.
Legionella Bacteria
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠14%Legionella Bacteria (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,964
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

13% percentile
025507510013.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate