Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 933 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis Public Schools results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 1,620 hits . Analysis detected 8,605 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,052 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (31,150 of 35,675 keywords). This St Louis Public Schools is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group. St Louis Public Schools
Keyword details
Total words: 11,052
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst