Speaker summary
⁠43%2 analyzed articles/videos219 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Hoffman results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 40.4% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 204 faulty-reasoning hits from 219 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (22,964 of 28,364 speakers). This Charles Hoffman is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Charles Hoffman
Speaker details
Total words: 219
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510019.0% percentile
13.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos219 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 40.4%40.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 40.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos