Speaker summary
ā 76%1 analyzed article/video53.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chantell Taylor results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 220 faulty-reasoning hits from 53.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70% and a BS Rank of ā 80% (5,826 of 28,326 speakers). This Chantell Taylor is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Chantell Taylor
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 80%Chantell Taylor (selected)70%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 53.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.4% percentile
70.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos53.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos