Speaker summary
⁠71%3 analyzed articles/videos233 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chandler Hottenstein results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Sunk Cost Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 599.837 faulty-reasoning hits from 233 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (25,601 of 28,364 speakers). This Chandler Hottenstein is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group.
Chandler Hottenstein
Speaker details
Total words: 233
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
02550751009.7% percentile
9.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos233 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 26.7%26.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos