Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chakrabarti results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) and Self-Serving Bias, with No True Scotsman as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (703 of 26,730 speakers). This Chakrabarti is worse (more manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group.
Chakrabarti
Speaker details
Total words: 24
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

97% percentile
025507510097.4% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos24 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%No True Scotsman: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.7%No True ScotsmanSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos