Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chad Fox results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 609.42 faulty-reasoning hits from 240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (22,134 of 26,730 speakers). This Chad Fox is better (less manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group.
Chad Fox
Speaker details
Total words: 240
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510017.2% percentile
12.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos240 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 30.6%30.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.4%23.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 2.5%Special Pleading: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 0.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos