Speaker summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video68.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chad Caton results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 190.256 faulty-reasoning hits from 68.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (17,623 of 28,364 speakers). This Chad Caton is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Chad Caton
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 68.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510037.9% percentile
23.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos68.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 40.7%40.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.1%31.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 18.5%18.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.6%12.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 40.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.1%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos