Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chad Bouton results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Overconfidence Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 54.1% saturation with 64.875 hits. Analysis detected 275.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (14,022 of 28,364 speakers). This Chad Bouton is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Chad Bouton
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 120
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510050.6% percentile
32.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos120 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 54.1%54.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 38.8%38.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 30.6%30.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.9%21.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 54.1%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 38.8%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos