Speaker summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video201.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cesar Jimenez results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 43.4% saturation with 131 hits. Analysis detected 442.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 201.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (22,011 of 28,364 speakers). This Cesar Jimenez is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Cesar Jimenez
Speaker details
Total words: 201.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510022.4% percentile
15.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos201.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 43.4%43.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 37.4%37.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 29.1%29.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 11.1%11.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.0%4.0%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 5.0%5.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 43.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 8.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.0%No True Scotsman: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos