Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video114.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cesar Espino results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 69.8% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 387.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 114.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,427 of 28,364 speakers). This Cesar Espino is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Cesar Espino
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 114.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510042.1% percentile
26.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos114.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 69.8%69.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 40.1%40.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.9%9.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 20.4%20.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 69.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 40.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos